ANSWER TO A RELIGIOUSLY IGNORANT PERSON

  Reply TO A Strictly Uninformed

Individual

Our Prophet (sall-Allâhu 'alaihi wa sallam) announced: "Each

youngster comes to the world with an unadulterated soul reasonable for turning into a

Muslim. Later their folks make them skeptical." This suggests

that instructing Islam to children is important. Their unadulterated spirits are

appropriate for Islam. A kid who has not learned Islam will

misjudge Islam by succumbing to the falsehoods and defamations of the

adversaries of religion. He will imagine that it is retrogressive or awful.

In the event that an individual who is strictly untaught and who has never

gotten any strict guidance or idea of Islam falls into the

traps of the foes of Islam, he will advance a seriously unique,

out and out opposite framework rather than Islam. He will succumb to

the harmful vaccinations and boldly famous works

coordinated to him. He won't discover a true sense of harmony in this world. Furthermore, he will

be floated towards vast catastrophes and torments in the following

world.

Each Muslim, even every individual, should realize how low, how

base the defamations which are legendary by the foes of Islam all together

to delude the adolescent are. Furthermore, all together not to float into condemnation

by accepting these falsehoods, we ought to grasp the sublimity of

Islam, understand that it upholds information, science, ethics and

wellbeing, and that it orders working, headway, participation

furthermore, common love. An insightful, cautious and refined individual, who has

perceived Islam accurately and indeed, won't put stock in that frame of mind of

the adversaries of Islam. It are strictly oblivious to See that they,

uninformed, misdirected and hopeless individuals, he will feel sorry for them. He

will wish that they could dispose of that appalling state and come

round to the right course.

We have run over a flyer of a few pages wrote

indecently by such a hoodwinked and strictly oblivious individual

with the end goal of spreading the harmful criticisms he had been

trained to taint sound spirits with the profound illness

- 40 -

that hauls him to unending disaster; he needs to ruin and

degenerate great individuals. Befuddling an essayist's title with

skill, the individuals who see its substance, which attacks truth,

goodness and excellence, may feel that it depends on perception

on information and that it contains esteem. To lessen the distress it

causes, it has been considered significant to compose reality as an

reply to the terrible defamations cited in the accompanying 12

sections. The guiltless youth, seeing these basely lied lies

also, the reality of the situation, will see plainly the strategies and stunts of

the adversaries of Islam and will effectively distinguish those block-headed,

degenerate souled doubters, who guarantee to be moderate:

1 — "The strict idea and strategy that have meddled in

public activity resemble chains limiting advancement in the public arena," he says.

Reply: Rasûlullah (sall-Allâhu 'alaihi wa sallam) proclaimed:

"Work for your wordly benefits as though you could never kick the bucket!" A

hadîth cited by al-Imâm al-Manâwî says, "Al-hikmatu dâllat almu'min." (Logical information is the lost property of the

Adherent. He ought to get it any place he tracks down it!). All men of

science, adversaries and companions the same, collectively express that the

Islamic religion upholds social advancement and reveals insight into the way

to progress. For instance. English Master John Davenport expressed,

"No individuals have at any point seemed who regard information and

culture more profoundly than Muslims do,"[1] and made sense of with

nitty gritty models and archives that Islam directed social orders to

progress and thriving.

In a discourse to a gigantic crowd in 1972 Dr. Kris Traglor,

an American teacher of history at the Tehcnical College of

Texas, expressed that the wellspring of motivation and advancement for

the European Renaissance was Islam; that Muslims, coming to

Spain and Sicily, had established the groundworks for present day strategies

what's more, advancements and had instructed that logical advancement would

be conceivable just through progress in science, medication,

space science, route, topography, map making and arithmetic;

what's more, that these parts of information had been brought to

Europe from North Africa and Spain by Muslims. He moreover

focused on the commitment of composed Islamic information on

significant materials and papyri as a significant connection in the

advancement of the cutting edge press.[2] The lies of an unethical,

[1] Had rodent Mu ham distraught and the Qur'ân, Section 2, Chap ter 2; Lon wear.

[2] Week after week pe ri o di cal, The Mus lim World, Dad kis tan, Au blast 26, 1972.

horrendous foe of Islam, who has no offer in information with the exception of a

title, surely can't conceal this reality. The sun can't be

put with tacky mud.

2 — "It is fundamental," he says, "to protect the State from the

shackle of religion. To find contemporary Western

human progress, foundation of a genuine common framework is required."

Reply: In Islam, totally liberal, majority rule States based

upon information, ethics, honesty and equity have been

laid out. It safeguards the State against being a toy in the

hands of political back-stabbers. Entrepreneurs, despots and workers of

socialism consider such a free system as a chain, a shackle hindering

their own demonstrations of brutality, torment and shamelessness. Killers,

hoodlums and untrustworthy individuals see equity and criminal codes as

chains put on themselves. There is compelling reason need to portray the

obliviousness and folly of a doubter who involves secularism as a

implies for communicating his ill will against the religion and who attempts

to annihilate Islam under the disguise of secularism. What this

man needs isn't the detachment of the religion from the State, however

the obliteration of the religion. Clearly a nitwit who

expects the countries' or the States' advancement not from information,

science, difficult work and ethics, however rather from the annihilation of

Islam, which addresses this multitude of ethics, and who yearns for the

West's indecency, profanity and vanity, is absent any trace of not just

astuteness and information yet in addition of ethics.

3 — He says, "By anesthetizing individuals with Islam's

reasoning of satisfaction, they hope to transform people into a

latent condition of not requesting their own freedoms. With the affection

that they will forestall socialism, they guard the ideas of

servitude and the following scene put stock in by individuals. Happiness

is a doublespeak for double-dealing. Supporters of Islam spread this

double-dealing."

Reply: There could be not many expressions as silly as the expression

"Islam's way of thinking of happiness." We have made sense of what

theory implies in Perpetual Ecstasy and explained that there is no

reasoning in Islam. Such an erroneous expression shows that the

individual who utilizes it remains unaware of Islam or reasoning and that

he, by remembering various expressions without monitoring

their implications, makes up many words to spread his

animosity towards Islam. For a really long time the foes of Islam have

been masking themselves as strict men and have been

executing their assaults behind such a veil. In any case, today they

assault all the while assuming a pretense of being the expert of a calling or craftsmanship

subsequent to getting a title of position. Those liars who, to

hoodwink Muslims, mask themselves as researchers and present

their non-logical assertions as realities are designated "fakers of

science." Islam, yet in addition the moral books moved by

each country acclaim satisfaction. As opposed to what this faker

of science tales, happiness doesn't mean surrendering one's

privileges and being inactive. Satisfaction implies being happy with

one's freedoms, with what one procures, and not abusing others' privileges.

Besides, this doesn't make individuals inactive, however supports them

to work and gain ground. Islam, in spite of this sham's

misrepresentation, doesn't guard subjugation however orders the

liberation of slaves. Subjection exists not in Islam, but rather in the

system of a fascism and in socialism. Grand books and

Prophets ('alaihimu 's-salâm), whose wonders were seen,

announced the presence of the following scene and insight; information

furthermore, science can't deny it. The expressions of this digressed idiot,

in any case, is simply personal and resolved misconception. He

gives neither a reference nor a logical premise. Faith in the

next world causes request, equity, shared love and solidarity in

social orders and nations. Mistrust in it prompts vagabondage,

latency, loss of the sense of obligation, selfishness, disunity and

aggression. It is surely great to put stock in something helpful. It is

sensible and important to keep away from something unconfirmed,

outlandish and vain. Islam rejects abuse and carelessness of

common liberties. Similarly as double-dealing is a transgression, so it isn't reasonable

to scheme at being hurt. In Islam, obliviousness, lethargy,

dismissing one's freedoms and being deluded are not pardons; they

are wrongdoings. There is a renowned saying that goes, "He who gives

agree to being hurt doesn't merit kindness." How might

abuse at any point exist in Islam? How might an individual with

information and reason at any point say as much? Hasn't the uninformed individual

who said so found out about the âyats and the different hadîths

protecting basic liberties? Not knowing or not having known about

them isn't a reason for him!

4 — "The East, retained in and inebriated with religion, has

turn out to be sick. Having îmân implies subjugation," he says.

Reply: Any peruser of history will obviously see the superiorities

of the Sabâhat al-kirâm ('alahimu 'r-ridwân) and the way that

Islam has shaped dynamic, diligent, impartial and valiant

countries. Great many models and a large number of books uncovering

this reality are accessible. It is a disgrace that a visually impaired individual doesn't

see the sun. Is it the sun's shortcoming that he doesn't see it? What is the

worth of a uninformed, deluded individual's calumniation of this

lifted up religion, this wellspring of joy and civilaziton, which is

appreciated by all wise and refined men whether companions or

adversaries? Something said or composed mirrors its proprietor. Numerous

individuals, when they blow up with their