Belittling (GHIYBAT)
Belittling (GHIYBAT)
Ghiybat means to slander a Devotee or a (non-Muslim
resident named) zimmî by referencing (one of) their flaws in
request to denounce them. Ghiybat is harâm. It isn't ghiybat if the
audience doesn't have the foggiest idea about the individual defamed. If the individual who
has been defamed would be miserable on the off chance that he heard it, it is
belittling. At the point when an individual is discussed in his nonappearance, if the
comments made about his body, his family lineage, his moral
conduct, his work, his discourse, his confidence, his common life, his
garments, or his creatures, are in such a nature as to hurt him if he
heard them, they are ghiybat. Undercover defaming, really that well
which is finished through signs, signals or composing, is basically as evil as
plain verbal conniving. The most corrupt kind of ghiybat is, for
case, a strict or devout individual's truism, "Al-hamd-u-lillâh
(recognition and appreciation be to Allah), we dislike him," when a
Muslim's wrongdoings or issues are referenced despite his good faith. [A hâfiz is
an individual who has committed the whole Qur'ân al-kerîm to his
memory.] One more completely accursed sort of criticizing is to say,
for example, "Al-hamd-u-lillâh, Allah didn't make us bold
like him," in the midst of a discussion which some way or another worries a
certain individual. So is the situation with undecided conniving like, for
occasion, to say regarding an individual, "He is an excellent individual,
except if... ." The twelfth âyat of Sûra Hujurât implies: "... Nor
criticize each other behind their backs. ..." Ghiybat implies
defaming, which thus has been contrasted with eating a dead
individual's tissue. It is expressed in a hadîth-I-sherîf: "upon the arrival of
Judgment, an individual's prize book will be opened. He will say,
Goodness my Ruler! As I was on the planet I performed such and such
demonstrations of love however they are not kept in the page. He will be
replied as follows: They have been eradicated from your book and
moved to the books of individuals you criticized." Another
hadîth-I-sherîf peruses: "upon the arrival of Judgment, the book
containing an individual's decent deeds 'hasanât' will be opened. He
won't see there the adores he ever performed. They will tell him
that these are the prizes 'thawâbs' of the people who criticized
him." Abû Hurayra 'radiy-Allâhu ta'âlâ 'anh' related the
following occasion: We were sitting with Rasûlullah 'sall-Allâhu
ta'âlâ 'alaihi wa sal-lam'. One of us got up and left. Somebody
among us made a remarking comment on why he had left.
Immediately Rasûlullah 'sall-Allâhu ta'âlâ 'alaihi wa sal-lam' said,
"You have belittled your companion. You have eaten his tissue."
Âisha 'radiy-Allâhu 'anhâ' related the accompanying occasion: At some point,
within the sight of Rasûlullah 'sall-Allâhu 'alaihi wa sal-lam' I
discussed a specific lady, it was tall to say that she. The
favored Courier of Allah dissuaded: "Let out whatever is
in your mouth!" I spat out. A piece of meat emerged from my
mouth. Allâhu ta'âlâ has ability to show ascribes and
specificities as material items. Ghiybat means to make reference to a
Muslim sibling's or a non-Muslim resident's (zimmî's) issue in
their nonattendance and in a way which would make them feel
pity assuming that they heard it. Allâhu ta'âlâ sent the accompanying
disclosure to Mûsâ (Moses) 'alaihis-salâm' "The gossipper who
(apologizes and) makes tawba from that point will be the last individual to
enter Heaven, though the gossipper who doesn't (apologize and)
make tawba for it will be the earliest inhabitant of Misery." Ibrâhîm
Adham 'rahimahullâhu ta'âlâ', (a darling slave of Allâhu ta'âlâ,)
was welcome to a supper. During the feast a truant, who must
have been late for the gathering, was condemned despite his good faith
for his gradualness. Immediately Ibrâhîm Adham 'rahimahullâhu
ta'âlâ' said, "Ghiybat has been committed at this spot," and left
altogether. It is expressed in a hadîth-I-sherîf: "On the off chance that the individual condemned
(despite his good faith) has the issue credited to him, then, at that point,
ghiybat has been committed. In any case it is an instance of buhtân
(defame)." It is ghiybat to condemn an individual (in his nonattendance) for
his strict blames, for example, carelessness of (the mandatory five day to day
petitions to God called) namâz, utilization of wine, burglary, gossipy;
as well concerning common deformities like deafness and squinteyedness. Analysis for strict deficiencies is ghiybat assuming it is expected
for criticism, and not assuming it is expected to improve the
individual concerned. As per a portrayal, it isn't ghiybat,
either, assuming that the analysis radiates from (the critizer's) individual
leniency. Nor would it be ghiybat to say, for example, "There is a
cheat, (or an individual who disregards his everyday petitions, or a
socialist) in this town." For, for this situation, the allegation
could never have been coordinated to someone in particular.
Comments
Post a Comment