GIVING Ill-advised NAMES TO MUSLIMS

Giving ill-advised names to a Muslim or considering a Muslim an

ill-advised name given by others isn't passable. Rasûlullah

'sall-Allâhu 'alaihi wa sal-lam' states in a hadîth-I-sherîf: "A

individual who has an ill-advised name ought to transform it to a decent

name." For instance, the name 'Âsiya' should be supplanted with

'Jamîla'. Giving decent names to Muslims is allowable.

Kids ought not be given eulogistic names like Rashîd

also, Amîn. Names like Muhyiddîn or Nûruddîn would be

imaginary and neulogistic (bid'at). It is a demonstration of makrûh to call

delinquents, dolts and backsliders with names of this sort,

which are eulogistic and commendatory. Nor might they at any point be utilized in their

non-literal subsenses. Some (Islamic researchers) communicated their

derivations concerning the vindicability of giving such names to your

kids for being honored with the propitious undertones

inborn in their implications. It is allowable and valuable to utilize

these names for those researchers who are prestigious for their devotion.

[Renowned researcher Ibn al-Âbidîn 'rahimahullâhu ta'âlâ' states in

the fifth fascicle of his book Radd-ul-Muhtâr that the best and

most legitimate names for Muslim kids are Abdullah, then

Abdurrahman, then Muhammad, then, at that point, Ahmad and afterward Ibrâhîm

in the request for need. It is likewise reasonable to give names of

Allâhu ta'âlâ like Alî, Rashîd, 'Azîz. Notwithstanding, names of this

level will have be expressed with due worship. An individual who

intentionally shows affront while referencing these names

turns into a doubter. For instance, saying "Abdulkoydur"

rather than Abdulqâdir, or "Hasso" rather than Hasan, or "Ibo"

rather than Ibrâhîm would be debasing these names. Despite the fact that

saying these words wouldn't cause skepticism when one doesn't

expect to corrupt them, trying not to utilize such words is better

which would come close to doubt. In the event that a kid bites the dust following

birth, it ought not be covered without giving a name. Despite the fact that

the name 'Abdunnabî is admissible, utilizing it is better not.

Hadrat Sayyid Abdulhakîm Arwâsî 'rahimahullâhu ta'âlâ'

taught for a quarter century after late evening supplication each

Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday at the Bayazid mosque in Istanbul

until he died in the year 1362 hijrî qamarî, [1943 A.D.]

During one of his teaches he expressed: "A kid has three rights on

his folks: giving a Muslim name upon entering the world; instructing him

perusing/composing, information ('ilm), and creates after coming to the

time of tact; and wedding him when he arrives at the period of

adolescence." A few ruffian individuals in Europe and America are

brought up in a skeptical and non-moral way and are given phony

confirmations and insightful titles and afterward shipped off Islamic nations.

These uninformed disbelivers are delegated to secondary schools and

colleges as instructors or teachers. They trap Muslim kids

with their situation and make them skeptical and nonmadhhabite. These youngsters affected by them effectively become

killers and backstabbers. Those guardians who send their children and

little girls to these schools are tossing their youngsters to the Damnation

with their own hands.]